Difference Between PBFT vs FBA Explained in 60 Seconds

In this video, we'll explore the key differences between Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) and Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA) consensus algorithms. PBFT and FBA are both designed to enable distributed systems to reach consensus in the presence of faulty or malicious nodes. However, they differ in their approaches to achieving this goal. PBFT is a classical Byzantine fault-tolerant algorithm that requires a fixed set of nodes to participate in the consensus process. These nodes are required to communicate with each other to reach agreement on the order of transactions. PBFT is known for its high throughput and low latency, making it a popular choice for high-performance blockchain networks. On the other hand, FBA is a more flexible consensus algorithm that allows for dynamic participation of nodes in the network. In FBA, nodes are organized into a federation, which can grow or shrink over time. Each node in the federation has the ability to vote on the validity of transactions. FBA is designed to be highly scalable and can accommodate a large number of nodes, making it a good choice for public blockchains. In summary, while both PBFT and FBA are designed to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance, they differ in their approach to achieving consensus. PBFT is a classical algorithm that requires a fixed set of nodes, while FBA is a more flexible algorithm that allows for dynamic participation of nodes in the consensus process. Interested to learn more? Watch /watch/INXQUR-p7FspQ #blockchain #smartcontracts #crypto #technology #proofofstake #proofofwork

الفئة